was the line of demarcation. The apartheid that supposedly moved out
of South Africa has now gone global. Paid mercenaries, who don't panic
because they are trained to kill, are being absolved of murder because "protesters
were ready to attack them". Are our (s)elected leaders being advised
by Ariel Sharon?
Chretien, along with the other leaders of this feudal gathering, "regrets
the violence", while insisting that they are leaders "elected
by democratic process". So was Hitler.
Democracy means that the majority rules. In ancient Greece the majority
ruled for slavery. With enough propaganda, a majority can be created for
any philosophy, no matter how faulty or cruel. Witness Ontario's Harris
regime, that does not require any input from either the public or the other
Proportional representation and campaign reform are always given lip service
during election campaigns but when the race is over, they soon land in
the trash. Choices are narrowed to the same small group of inheriting families
with like minds and like money, whether it is local or global.
Now Chretien and his cronies are looking for a meeting place that is safe
from protesters. How about the Bertchesgarten? The WTO has solved the problem.
Their next soiree is in Qatar, where protests and demonstrations are illegal.
The result of corporate rule is no different from communist or fascist
rule. Totalitarianism behaves the same, no matter what its ideological
skin. The danger is that the share(slave)holders in the global plantation
may win by default, because the diverse groups of protesters cannot see
past the veil of corporate logos to the inner sanctum.
It is no coincidence that the first goldsmith/bank was in Venice and that
investments in the slave trade were first managed from there. Banks are
the largest corporations; they dictate to lesser corporations such as monarchies,
parliaments and business, through their loans. All the "trade" agreements
are written by the international banks; they are debt contracts on a global
scale, demanding payment in the form of tangible resources. From the bankers'
manipulation, few countries are now self-sufficient.
The price of everything
we buy -- from the roof over our heads to the crust of bread -- contains
a silent tax, compound interest.
Capitalism, as originally defined in early America, is not the problem.
The cancer in capitalism, that drives "growth at any cost", is
compound interest on loans from thin air, leeching the blood of the planet.
Take back the illegitimate creation of money from the private bankers and
return the medium of exchange to governments. Then sovereign nations may
have a chance. There could be a global community of independent countries
co-operating with each other, instead of the planned "World Order" ruled
by the same oligarchy of the last 300 years.
Other U.S. presidents, along with Lincoln and Kennedy, knew there would
be no economic democracy with a privatized central bank. They were assassinated
because they knew it. Andrew Jackson got rid of the private central bank
between 1830 and 1840; and, for the first time, the U.S. had a surplus
instead of a debt. Jackson parceled out the surplus to the states for
infrastructure. Shortly after, an assassin with two pistols shot Jackson
at close range and missed him both times. (Maybe he wasn't paid enough
to buy glasses.)
Soon after the bankers' coup of 1913, a brilliant mathematician and engineer,
Major C. H. Douglas, invented a sound and logical economic system which
counted citizens as assets and resulted in economic equity to business
and individuals. He named this system Social Credit. It was based on
the idea of the credit union, but was applied nationally. In 1932, the
U.S. Congress voted overwhelmingly to integrate his system.
The unassailable logic of Social Credit was the biggest threat that the
global money privateers had ever faced. The mailed fist of the "Federal" Reserve
came down quicker than you could say "foreclosure" and the popular
bill never made it to the Senate. If not for that second tragedy, Americans
might have a guaranteed national income instead of "welfare" and
a universal health care system instead of the dollars-or-die death care
they have now.
Canadians are but little better off because MacKenzie King, who was a
crony of Rockefeller, only gave the Bank of Canada 50 per cent of the
money creation, when he had promised 100 per cent. Consequently, today's
honest, interest-free money is down to 2 per cent -- the change in your
Now we are told that we "can't afford our social programmes".
What we are not being told is that our taxes are paying out $45 billion
every year in interest alone to private banks for loans that our government
used to get from the Bank of Canada at minimal or no interest.
We have been betrayed by the "managers" of our central bank,
which supported our infrastructure, physical and social, for 41 years and
could do so today. It is not the Bank of Canada that is at fault, but the
intentional disobedience of its Charter.
The only way we can save our sovereignty and the earth's environment
is by reclaiming government issuance of new money. Newly created money
should not have interest on it because it has not yet performed a service.
The bankers know this, but their paid academics will not tell you. Instead,
privately owned central banks charge interest on every new dollar they
The United States was the first nation to cut out the middle man in their
money system by giving Congress the right to issue new money. You see,
Congress was the only body directly responsible to the people, preventing
any hanky panky by politicians or their pals. The bankers' cartel, which
had already mortgaged Europe, was terrified that America's brilliant
and logical example would be followed by other countries, that they would
be cast down from the heights of king-making to the banking benches.
After inflicting wars, depressions and assassinations to weaken the country,
the European privateer bankers got their vengeance by usurping America's
monetary system on Dec. 23, 1913. Since that black day, the United States
government, like all others before it, has had to pay interest on every
bill the financiers print. Americans were deprived of their credit for
building the nation; they staggered on through more wars, depressions
and assassinations; and today, compound interest is still leeching from
every citizen's effort.
Canadians are in the steerage of the same leaky boat.
Today, the brave and enthusiastic protesters are blaming "capitalism" instead
of the parasitic usury which has infested all human production. Einstein
was once asked what was the most powerful formula in the world. He replied
without hesitation: "compound interest". The "capitalism" that
naive students now protest is cartelism: monopolies that were once illegal,
the first one being the bankers' monopoly of the issuance of money and
credit. (For those new to monetary history, the formula for this virtual
counterfeiting is set out in "The Turn of the Screw", D&D,
The international bankers, who can manufacture billions at will, are
the ones paying the police armies to happily beat dissenters senseless.
They've simply exchanged the larcenous pen of the goldsmith for a computer
keyboard. This has enabled them to trade globally in their favourite
renewable resource - people.
The mutation of economics does not mean that banking should be done away
with, or that all banks should be nationalized. If you want to own a
Maserati but you can't pay cash, you can try to talk your local banker
into lending you the money to do so. You have that choice and the burden
of interest that goes with it. Commercial banks have a function, but
they must remain lending brokers, not creators of money.
The second idiocy is that central banks are "owned" by private "shareholders"!
But that is the case. A central bank must belong to the people because
its vault is the country -- with all its resources, including the intellect
and labour of its citizens. New money is then issued debt-free according
to production and consumption.
The massive revisionist history which has forced acceptance of private
central banks proves that, like smoking or eating blowfish, a self-destructive
act can become a habit, even a tradition. For instance, the Revolutionary
War was not caused by a "tax on tea", as naive teachers expound,
but, as Benjamin Franklin explained: "It was England forbidding the
colonies to use their own interest-free scrip" that sparked the revolution.
Today, the eye of the octopus is still the global banking cartel, and
it's grown much longer tentacles. These are the "free trade" agreements
-- not much different than the previous opium trade agreements and the
slave trade agreements. Descendants of the same money masters pass them
on with instructions to our (s)elected leaders. As long as the citizens
are convinced that some political philosophy will bring economic democracy,
while remaining ignorant of the false monetary system, the rentiers of
money will back all factions and keep its lenders ruling in obscene luxury
on the interest.
The ruling banks are absolutely impartial as to which revolution or war
they invest in, and the biggest plum is in the works -- the global plantation.
How has this economic absurdity of "money from thin air" escaped
detection and gone on to become an accepted part of national and global
finance? The one revolution that the banking cartel fears is the one against
them. They have ensured that this will not happen because they decide the
kind of history that will be taught and what kind of economics will be
recognized. Any student today who is paying exorbitant fees for a degree
in history, political science or economics, is wasting his time and money.
He is being sold a selective education, full of errors and omissions --
one that will allow him to "kick against the pricks" just long
enough to learn his lesson and ultimately conform for his own survival.
He will read the texts set before him and carry anti-capitalism signs,
not knowing that Rothschild, in a fit of pique, inflicted the War of 1812
on America because they didn't want his bank. Nor does that student know
that Rothschild also said, "Let me control the money of a country
and I care not who makes its laws."
The protestor will risk his life in the front line, unaware that the
Rockefellers and the Rothschilds gave millions to Stalin, Trotsky, Lenin
and Hitler -- and are still betting on both sides today.
The international socialist wants a revolution but he has not read Plato's
warning: "The money-lenders keep their eyes on the ground and do
not appear to see the poor revolutionaries [emphasis added], but they injure
by exacting interest at many times the principal sum, and so they create
a considerable number of drones and beggars..." Since Plato first
warned his students about the man nobody sees, the drones and beggars have
increased a billionfold. Aristotle, G. K. Chesterton, C.S. Lewis and many
others of integrity have pointed out how conspicuous is the banker's absence
from the wars and depressions in "educational" texts.
The global presidium have always known that the best lie is the lie that
is almost true. This maxim governs all "education", right up
to the most rarified air of academia. The revisions of history are being
carved in marble as I write. Indulgent in everything they survey, their
authors are only frugal with the facts. Just as an "excess of democracy" was
bothersome to Rockefeller, so is it annoying to corporate universities
and their think tanks. A student of political theory told me recently that
in a Plato text, the professor told the class they could skip a certain
chapter, but he decided to read it. The chapter concerned usury, a word
that is now verboten by unwritten law. Apparently economic injustice no
longer has a place in "political theory".
Welcome to the corporate "special ed" that passes for learning.
The second maxim of the free trade overseers, is that the best slave
is the one who believes he is free. Freedom means responsibility for
your own actions, but we are indoctrinated to believe that the most
important responsibility is to pay our debts. What is never discussed
is that your debts are usually paid many times over, before you are
free of them.
"Whether it is nobler in the mind" for the debtor to starve while
he is paying for his roof four times over, or more responsible to "take
up arms" against a sea of loan sharks, is now the pertinent question.
Protesters against the IMF [International Monetary Fund]and the World
Bank have made the connection that compound interest is literally starving
people to death. As C.S. Lewis stated: "A crime that has been condemned
by the ancient Greeks, 19th century philosophers and the great Christian
teachers, has become the foundation on which our whole existence is based!"
The Bolshevik Revolution made no difference to Rockefeller; his Russian
bank remained unscathed. After all, he and his European banking pals
invested hugely in the "glorious revolution" which resulted
in the death of some 60 million, while usury remained alive and well.
It all started when Mordecai Levi, a man with an idea, married into the
aristocracy and became Karl Marx. He declared that religion was "the
opiate of the people," and then proceeded to invent his own. Unfortunately,
like his ideology, he had to be supported by capitalism in the person
of the industrialist Engels in order to survive.
Marx was too early for the cathode ray tube or he could have been the
first televangelist. Instead, Communism's gurus had to depend on the
largesse of the bankers, and even that didn't come close to the average
take of Tammy Faye Baker or the 700 Club. If all the television sets
were to go black tomorrow, there would be a global revolution before
Christmas. Vicarious living would be over; people would stare into the
bone white eye sockets of reality, and rage would reign. The banking
cartel loves television, so much so, that they bought it.
In setting up an apartheid economy, the smart parasite always remembers
that he cannot completely destroy his host, or he goes down with the
ship. Now the G8 crowd are going to invite some poor countries to the
table. They ostensibly are going to make "poverty" the subject
of their next conference. They will not apply economic justice to eradicate
it; but, like cancer and AIDS, they will establish poverty as a burgeoning
industry. They will develop and drain off resources, leaving the locals
just enough sustenance for a "mini" life of the bare essentials.
But should there be even a small uprising, the bankers and their corporate
subsidiaries can buy (with their private printing press) every mercenary
on the globe, supplying each one with more weapons than Arnold Schwarzenegger.
The only way to free the slaves from the Global Plantation is to cut
the bankers off at the pass and clamor for their illegitimate money franchise
to be taken away. Since they have taken over a government's right to
issue its own money (by misleading the politicians to vote for it) then
Americans can, in turn, reclaim that right by rescinding those spurious
bills. Canadians can reclaim their right to use the Charter of the Bank
of Canada as it was written by demanding that this government stop borrowing
from private and foreign banks and return those loans to our imperfect
but usable central bank. We must stop the unethical compound interest
of the last 300 years that drives the growth-at-any-cost psychosis. If
we do not, the earth may become a charred blister of melted plastic widgits.
Countries cannot keep up with their phony debts without sacrificing their
citizens. Apartheid economies are being created by privatizing all public
assets and public lands in order to pay these debts that have already
been paid many times. Privatization means no regulations and those previously
public assets, such as water, have already become public poisons. De-listing
and user fees will inflict an apartheid health care system, where wealth
determines your life span.
In Ontario, funds have now been robbed from the public education system
to be handed over to private religious schools. This will drive public
education into "partnerships" with corporations -- further
dumbing down the majority who will be indoctrinated as peaceful consumers,
while the elite are educated to manage them. As the opposition told the
Finance Minister in the Ontario Legislature: "This Bill will create
segregation and elitism" -- the two illnesses of apartheid.
I asked a teacher who had attended the token hearings how she felt about
the destruction of public education and health care. She replied, "Like
The fight for equitable economics is a fight for life itself. Many good
men and presidents were assassinated before 1913 and many more have been
assassinated since. It is an ongoing battle. We have seen the boot come
down in Genoa. Those risking their lives should know who actually buys that boot. They are the same ones who spawned infections of apartheid
in the past and who are happily speculating on their shares in the coming
Before a new reader may think I have made too much of the monetary solution,
let me tell you what happened when I was invited to appear on Counterspin,
the show with the "cutting edge".
Someone told them that I "knew about banking." They did not
know exactly what I knew, or they would not have called.
The former chairman of the Royal Bank was the guest. He was arguing unconvincingly
that there was no cause for complaint, that the initiated of the temple
did really know best. After being on the hot seat for a few minutes,
Mr. McCallum tried to avoid my questions by declaring, "But I'm
not with the bank anymore. I'm now an MP." I replied, "Even
more dangerous,"and the microphone was immediately whisked away.
Meanwhile, many in the audience were clamoring for a show on the Bank
of Canada and its history of lending to the government at no interest.
Avi Lewis promised, on the air, that he would do this. At the close of
the show, the former chairman of the Royal Bank was heard to ask Avi
in anxious tones: "You're not really going to do a show on the Bank
of Canada, are you?" That was a year ago and no such show has yet
Recently, the abuse of our central bank has reached its nadir. Bank of
Canada bonds have been privatized! They're being handed over to the management
of the EDS Texas Corporation. I am fairly certain that this latest atrocity
will amputate, along with the Bank, any hope of the promised Counterspin.
Well Avi, I guess the only "cutting edge" that Canadians are
going to see is the one on the infamous double axe!